Subculture Builds Brands, Then Tests Them
Part of the ongoing Culture & Signal series
How ritual, community and participation shape signal — and why scale doesn’t have to dilute meaning
When I’m on the tube, I often find myself looking at what people are wearing and thinking about what they’re saying without saying anything at all. A pair of Jordans. A vintage band tee. A 247 hoodie. A certain haircut. It’s rarely random. Even if they’re not consciously doing it, it’s signalling something.
It reminds me of running. When I pass another runner, we nod. We wouldn’t acknowledge each other walking down the street, but in that context there’s instant recognition. No words needed.
Subculture works in a similar way.
In the early 2000s I used to spend most Saturdays in record shops in Liverpool. They were in a shopping precinct called The Palace. Aside from the record shops, there were other alternative shops and independent sellers. The same people would show up most weeks.
You weren’t just buying records. You were listening, talking, finding out what was new, what mattered, what didn’t. Over time you started to recognise faces. Relationships formed. You became part of it.
It wasn’t about being cool. It was about being there.
What those Saturdays gave me wasn’t just music. It was a clear example of how culture builds itself before any brand ever touches it.
There was depth because there was repetition. The more time you spent there, the more familiar it became. You started to understand which labels mattered. Which DJs were worth paying attention to. Which conversations were serious and which were surface level.
That’s what separates subculture from trend.
Trend is consumption. Subculture is connection. Trend is buying something because it’s visible. Subculture is showing up repeatedly until you’re recognised.
The clothing, the records, the symbols come later. They’re markers of something that already exists.
Punk didn’t start with fashion. It started with reaction to the moment. The fashion followed. Acid house didn’t begin with smiley faces. It began in warehouses and fields. The iconography came afterwards. Even the modern gym movement isn’t really about clothing. It’s about discipline, optimisation and shared routine. The apparel simply signals participation.
Subculture forms when enough people respond to the same condition in a similar way. Over time that response develops ritual. Ritual creates recognition. Recognition creates identity.
Brands don’t create that.
They either grow from inside it, or they attach themselves to it later.
When a brand grows from inside a subculture, it inherits the depth that already exists. That’s why some brands feel earned. They weren’t imposed. They were present. They showed up where the culture was already forming and became part of the ritual.
Jordan is a good example of this. It didn’t invent basketball culture. It grew inside it. Courts, neighbourhoods, stories, moments. Over time the logo stopped being just a logo. It became shorthand for competition, aspiration and dominance. You didn’t need an explanation. You either understood it or you didn’t.
That’s the feedback loop.
Subculture forms through shared condition. Brands emerge from inside it. Scale tests whether the original meaning survives.
Scale is where things get interesting.
Because once something moves beyond the early community, the signal changes. Access increases. More people wear it, talk about it, adopt it. That doesn’t automatically mean dilution. It means the ritual has changed.
The record shops I used to spend Saturdays in didn’t disappear because the culture sold out. They disappeared because technology changed the infrastructure. Downloads and streaming removed the need for a physical meeting point. The ritual collapsed. The community decentralised.
But the desire for depth didn’t vanish.
Vinyl has been growing steadily again for years, with sales reaching levels not seen since the late 1980s. A large portion of those sales now come through independent record stores. Many of the people driving that resurgence are younger, not older. It isn’t nostalgia. It’s intentionality. In a world of infinite streaming, choosing to buy a physical record has become its own kind of signal again.
The ritual didn’t die. It reassembled.
The same thing is happening in other spaces. Take the rise of 24/7 running pop-ups organised by the brand itself. Hundreds of people show up in key cities, not because they were targeted by an ad, but because they want to train together.
What makes it feel authentic is simple.
The founders live the lifestyle.
The brand creates space for people to come together.
And the people who show up feel part of something bigger than a product.
The apparel becomes a uniform for participation.
That’s the distinction.
When I look at people on the tube now, I sometimes wonder whether they’re participating in something or simply performing identity.
There’s a difference.
Participation comes from repetition. From showing up. From being there long enough to be recognised. Performance can be bought overnight.
This idea echoes something I noticed while reviewing 100 of the world’s most enduring ads — the brands that stand the test of time are the ones rooted in real communities, not manufactured appeal. The strongest signals are earned through participation, not projected for approval.
At the surface, anyone can wear the symbol.
At depth, the symbol only carries weight if the community behind it is still active.
Scale doesn’t dilute signal.
Disconnection does.
Culture & Signal
An ongoing exploration into how brands grow from inside communities, how ritual creates meaning, and why signal only lasts when participation stays real.
Explore the full series →